|
View Poll Results: Which one do you pick? | |||
Option A | 25 | 86.21% | |
Option B | 4 | 13.79% | |
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Search this Thread |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
On a serious note, it'd have to be option A. I'm unlikely to ever meet anything close to the girl of my dreams, and I don't often go to Olive Garden anyway, so I'm used to not having Olive Garden breadsticks.
(It may not seem like it, but hey. I'm 14. I do have a girl of my dreams.) |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Because that's how it works, man. You can't just have both. Through some crazy existentialist plot you're banned from Olive Garden if you pick A, and through a completely different existentialist convoluted plot your love is out of your Reich if you pick B.
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
So now I'm saying that. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
*inhales deeply* I'll get shot for this, but I don't like Olive Garden nor their Bread Sticks. >w<;; So I chose choice A. True love lasts for eternity, yumminess only lasts until you are done digesting.
Last edited by LugiaDialga; July 8, 2012 at 05:36:24 PM. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Option A. If I chose Option B, I'd get so depressed I'd endlessly use the Olive Garden for comfort food. I'd get so large, I wouldn't be able to move. That would mean I'd end up dying from malnutrition. Or a heart attack. Or a piano falling on my head because an Unidentified Flying Object would drop it on me, assuming I'm in a field where population is sparse.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
So much over-analysis in your choices and being rational. Where's my army of breadstick lovers!? We don't need your "love", we want out breadsticks! (Even though I picked choice A, it doesn't count because the love of my life is fictional =w= )
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
I am seriously never going to talk to someone who picked A ever again. You would be crazy not to live with B.
The person of the dreams thing wouldn't work unless they were forced to love you, because how do you know that they love you back. And if they were being forced then thay would make them unhappy because they dont really like you and that will make that person feel unhappy. And if you love them you wouldn't want them to be unhappy. And if they did love you then that great, but love doesn't last forever. You will get bored of them, or you will find someone that fulfills your dreams more. But you will as well beforce to love that person because you picked A. So you are an idiot to pick A. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Serious Answer: Never been to Olive Garden, so my natural inclination would be to pick A. And besides, I'm not too fond of breadsticks anyways.
Unserious Reply: Perhaps what Vel is trying to say here is that perhaps true love is Olive Garden breadsticks. By choosing A, you cannot get B, and vice versa, but under this brilliant plan, A is B. But if A = B, then they would have to be of equal value. So in reality, true love = the divine bliss of eating Olive Garden breadsticks. That would mean that you could get the same satisfaction out of either A or B, and that choosing either one is merely an exercise in futility, as either option ends with the same fate. However, at the same time, you can't have both. Assuming A = B, as I stated before, wouldn't that be the same as saying that by having A, you can't have A, and if you chose B, you can't have B? But maybe that is another theory that can be proposed here. Perhaps, while A is B, some part of A does not equate to B. But wouldn't that also mean that A isn't equal to B? I suppose so, as you can't exactly consume true love and it wouldn't flow through your digestive tracts. But that wouldn't follow the originally proposed master plan. Perhaps the difference is so infinitesimally small that it still means that A = B, similar to how 0.9999999999999... equals 1. Very clever indeed. Last edited by GrassPokemonFTW; August 1, 2012 at 08:46:42 PM. |