#2
|
||||
|
||||
I do believe we worked out overused moves and Shaking Off in VRIM over the last couple days.
You said -10% accuracy for every time a move is used, as the other side will be expecting it. As for the Shaking Off, you said 3 per battle, but you weren't clear on chances of success or what status conditions can be Shaken Off. I would also like to suggest a heirarchy system for that, with a max of 3 Shake Offs in a Single Battle, and 4 in a Double Battle (with people putting challenges deciding a number between 1-max, of course). |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I think anyone reffing a Triple Battle should get $10 per round, as it contains 6 moves, and you have to keep in mind every Pokémon's location, making it much tougher to keep track of than a Double Battle (which nets $8 per round).
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Just to let people know, do NOT post questions regarding moves and ask what they do in ASB because I am currently working on a list of the moves and it will have the description of what each move does in ASB. Just give me some time.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
My only problem here is the banning of Shedinja. I understand your reasoning, but Shedinja could still use some love.
Sure, it'd sound understandable in the actual Pokemon games, but his is ASB, which has distinct differences. First off, it's not entirely impossible to defeat a Shedinja. You have to take into account that you can use any move possible here. You're not just limited to four moves. Plus the fact that Shedinja doesn't necessarily have such a "devastating" movepool that would make it that broken. So in reality, it is possible to defeat a Shedinja if you have the right strategy. For some it may be difficult, some it may be easy, either way, it's possible. Also, if you want to go by the logic of Shedinja being "broken", add some more Pokemon to that list, 'cause there's some Pokemon that can prove to be quite difficult to defeat. Aaaand, I also discourage banning No Guard. It's pretty much neutral and does not necessarily favor any side. You've gotta remember that No Guard gives both the user and the opponent's moves perfect accuracy. So, in theory, the opponent and/or the user can use an OHKO move that will instantly end the battle, but that's what clauses are for. (Yes, I do know that No Guard probably hasn't been discussed, but it's an ability that can be considered "broken".) Last edited by Shiny; January 24, 2012 at 02:21:01 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I don't remember the No Guard thing. Gastro Acid prevents things like that. So I think it isn't right to ban an ability. I have a pokemon with No Guard, so what am i supposed to do about it. Do i buy a new one?!? Why should I have to pay for something you took away. It is unlawful, and I am kinda ticked.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I said I discouraged the possibility of it ever being banned. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Shiny, the reason why Shedinja was banned was due to its ability. One day in the chat, Syra was asked how Shedinja would work in ASB. After about 30 minutes, we concluded that Shedinja would have the same damage cap as the other Pokemon, but then that brought up the question on Wonder Guard. After about 15-20 minutes of looking for the answer, Syra discovered that Wonder Guard actually lowers all moves' accuracies by 50%, making Shedinja very unfair in battle. Plus, Shedinja can learn Flash which isn't banned by most rules I've seen, making Shedinja that much harder to hit.
In conclusion, I support the banning of Shedinja... no matter how much I love Shedinja. It's just too overpowered in ASB due to it being very hard to hit. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Once again, strategy comes into play.
Quote:
I should also mention Super Effective moves such as Aerial Ace that always hit- no matter what- can be used against one. I would also like to know where you both got this information that Wonder Guard reduces the move's accuracy. Both Bulbapedia and Serebii say nothing about that. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Shiny; January 25, 2012 at 04:02:56 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry for the double post, but I need to post this and make it so it's read.
I think if a non-official starts a battle, that person should be fined some money for doing so. If a ref starts a battle, then that judge should not only be fined, but receive a warning for doing so. If that ref starts another battle, they should have their ref title revoked and be unable to become a ref again for a month. Last edited by Quadcentruo; January 26, 2012 at 01:37:17 PM. |
|