#3
|
||||
|
||||
So... basically you want this game to be more of an online MMO hack-n-slash RPG? Well, I wouldn't object to that. There's definitely a lot more they could've put into this game (and, as you pointed out some time ago, with Rumble) that could make the game much better.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
While these are great recommendations, they certainly aren't going to happen. People like us are going to get the game no matter how good or crappy it is anyway. It's actually sad how everything is about making money for little work.
I mean, I got Pokémon Rumble in the first place because I thought it had Wi-Fi play where you could face off against others. Sure, I still say that PR is a decent game, but that's mainly because I'm a Pokémon fan. I digress, your ideas are lovely and the game would be perfect if they were in! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
What I see is that most of my ideas have been done to some extent...in separate games and not as effectively.
I like to believe that game companies do look at user posts on forums and see what kind of responses they get from their games. Valve, for example, does this often on their forums and looks to improve games like TF2 as best as possible based on user input. I doubt Game Freak doesn't have someone looking through a few websites (possibly even this one) every now and then and looking to see what ideas we come up with. Even if this thread falls in obscurity, at least I posted what everyone else was thinking (to some extent). And I'm not saying that Pokepark is bad. I'm saying it could be better for the sequel or another non-turn based RPG Pokemon game. |
|