#4
|
||||
|
||||
I am sorry to say this, but your points are not as solid as you might think. Now I take no position in this debate, since I am not American, but as a neutral viewer, I dare say that you aren't totally right.
First of all, there is physics behind the impact. Those with the theory that the aeroplanes aren't enough provided mathematical simulation, suggesting that the impact wouldn't be as huge, or that its direction would be different than what happened. If you don't provide diagrams and graphs that can prove an aeroplane can cause such a damage and make the towers fall downwards, then you can at least start to convince people. The second thing to keep in mind is not to trust a politician, no matter who he is. Personally, I have grown to mistrust every politician, since they just promise to gain their position and then leave the poor people alone. I understand it was your government, but don't trust them blindly. Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if they, or any government in this world, decided to sacrifice thousands of people in order to receive a political gain. Trust me, they don't care. Yes, they might not have done it, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't. And a government is strong enough to replace security guards with its agents to prepare the plan. What I am trying to say is that not everything told on television by the higher-ups is true, the higher-ups are not as good as what you may think and in this world, brutally sacrificing people has become a trend. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You haven't provided any reasoning or insight of your own, you've only reminded that nothing is infallible, which is a given. You're telling me not to trust politicians, which I'm not getting my beliefs from anyway. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
What I find weird is that the Twin Towers were specially designed to withstand a plane's impact. Plus, jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel and cause the towers to collapse at freefall speed.
Another strange coincidence- FEMA happened to be in the WTC area since the day before, perfectly positioned to ship off all the rubble, hence removing any evidence that would've helped a real investigation, and turned the situation into what actually happened. Also related: Why is there no footage of the Pentagon being hit if there were at least 85 cameras perfectly positioned around the Pentagon? Aldditionally, Building 7 (another steel-framed building) collapsed in 6 seconds, despite not being hit directly by a plane. The corporate media spread just enough propaganda and lies to push Congress into signing a 400-page Orwellian and Draconian legislation (known as the Patriot Act) taking away all of our freedoms, pushing America into a state of drooling desperation to get us to rally behind a puppet President who pushed us into an illegal war based on lies that has subsequently been responsible for the deaths of over a million people in Iraq, who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. Last edited by Velociraptor78; July 16, 2012 at 03:41:44 PM. Reason: Formatting |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The other thing you talked about is how much a hassle it is for it to be a conspiracy, using this as a reason to dismiss the theory. This is why I told you not to trust politicians and don't take matters too easily. It might be a harder operation, but the results were beneficial to the government too, which is why the government would be ready to tire itself with such a plan and sacrifice thousands to gain those benefits. It is you who needs to look more carefully into such important matters, as you are only dismissing other rivaling theories just because they are harder to operate. Remember, they could be harder, but are still possible. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I personally find it disrespectful for those who think this was a conspiracy by the government. This tragedy was a terrorist plot, unfortunately executed well, that killed thousands of Americans. That's all there is to it. I understand that people always like to try and find suspicious info to make things seem more complicated than they really are, but to me it's just to distract people from the painful truth. People want scapegoats, essentially.
Last edited by Cyrus; July 16, 2012 at 09:07:19 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One hilarious claim I've seen is the one that the jet fuel would need to melt the steel ( 1525° C ) but it burned at 825° C, totally ignoring the fact that steel loses 50% of its structural integrity at 648 ° C. If I were to see a vase was knocked over in my house, it's a lot more logical to assume a member of the household knocked it over than assume martians visited my house and knocked it over. It's basic economy of logic. Plurality should not be posited without necessity. A.) Thousands of FBI agents, firefighters, demolition experts, scientists, CIA agents, rescue workers, police, airline pilots, the entire NSA, the majority of the House of Representatives, air traffic control, high-level military contractors, and the entire Bush administration are all in on it and realllly good at keeping secrets. B.) Somebody flew an airplane into a building to murder foreign nationals they don't agree with. Acts like B.) happen every day and it's not out of the ordinary. People kill others they don't agree with. It's a real shock, I know. A.) requires a lot of unnecessary assumptions. Consider the parties responsible have claimed responsibility. When you hear hoof beats, think horses, not zebras. Last edited by hinorashi; July 16, 2012 at 09:38:30 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
All I have to say is, It might of been a terrorist attack ,but it might of not been.I don't want to get more into it .We don't know what it was,and I doubt that we will ever know.I don't live in the US of A so I cant really say that much I guess .But all I have to say is just leave it ,that is what the government wants you to do ,so they can control you.(enough said)
|
|