|
|
#1
February 15, 2009, 11:55:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Bad websites
Which types of websites are the bad(in your opinion)?
(NEW, I recently discovered)First, it is fancy text(mostly in title) like this: (Ż`·._)ŃĂ®|_|Ż|ŻŐ(Ż`·._) It lost all semantics of the title, and it's not Google-friendly. I saw many females do that. Second, it is multimedia combo(3 BGMs, 4 videos playing at same time), it slow down the page. Third, it is canned JavaScript, the webmaster copy-and-paste scripts from DynamicDrive and think they are cool. One example of abuse of canned JavaScript is trailing cursors: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qide9Z4PWG8 The bad websites are on MySpace. |
|
#2
February 17, 2009, 08:19:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Quote:
And all those books about creating an effective site say JavaScript is a powerful and useful tool...just use it wisely! Just look at YouTube. Half of its features are based on JavaScript; that is a perfect example of well-written JavaScript. Now I don't even want to go into the pages that bring up "A script error has occured", "Do you want to debug?", "A script on this page is causing the browser to run slow" or the helpless " ". |
|
#3
February 17, 2009, 02:17:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
JavaScript is good if you use it wisely.
Copying and pasting scripts is unwise |
|
#4
February 18, 2009, 08:17:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
I've found a few handy scripts that work rather nicely, such as the one for the photo albums on my site (SSBB and Ranch) or the one for the Pokémon Platinum countdown, both of which required tweaking. I actually had to write a script from scratch for the jukebox on my new site, because all the existing ones do things that are difficult to implement, are Flash-based and only play MP3s (not everyone has super-fast Internet and can wait for those), cost money
 , or restart the music every time you click a link.
|
|
#5
February 18, 2009, 02:20:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
We are talking about bad practices,
First, it's fancy texts, where people talk like this: еĐę, †hď§ ď§ vęrĄ ˘đđl! ď'm ąłł7! If someone's computer does not support that encoding, it will show garbled text, also, it do not benefit Google. http://piplup-princess.com/ is one example of fancy text user. They just use fancy text in titles. |
|
#6
February 19, 2009, 07:48:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Ah yes, [.+?» ??????-????˘???.˘?? «?+.]
|
|
#7
February 19, 2009, 08:26:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
I can Google a bunch:
http://www.google.ca/search?q=%D1%95&ie ... =firefox-a (scroll down) I don't know why a lots of girls use it |
|
#8
February 22, 2009, 04:05:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Bingo. Scroll down to #6:
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9605.html There are lots of interesting articles here: http://www.useit.com/alertbox |
|
#9
February 22, 2009, 05:26:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
It didn't say much about fancy texts...
I'm exporting this thread to other forums to find more answers |
|
#10
February 24, 2009, 06:59:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Oh, I forgot about WebPagesThatSuck.com!
|
|
#11
December 4, 2009, 07:13:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bad websites
I nominate my page ._.
Sure it looks good, but if you have any knowlege of HTML, you'll see how bad I mash things together just to create a website. AT LEAST I use standard letters and no fancy UTF-8 encoding. |
|
#12
December 21, 2009, 12:03:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Hah, interesting topic! Piplup Princess does overuse those fancy text tho =/
|
|
#13
December 25, 2009, 10:20:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Myspace is not a website @_@
Other website I must say... there's a lotta... anyone see my website tips yet? Some sites making a really boring tutorial @_@ basic html... |
|
#14
December 26, 2009, 01:33:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Bad websites
Quote:
|
|
